*
VS
*
Which cartridge....1. Packs a superior punch/KE.2. Deals more damage to tissues.3. Has actually superior penetration.4. Is more accurate.5. Is more cost effective.6. Which have to you buy, a .50 Cal am Rifle or a .700 NE searching Rifle.

You are watching: 700 nitro express vs 50 bmg


*

Which cartridge....1. Packs a exceptional punch/KE.2. Deals much more damage come tissues.3. Has actually superior penetration.4. Is an ext accurate.5. Is much more cost effective.6. Which have to you buy, a .50 Cal to be Rifle or a .700 NE searching Rifle.
1. The .50 BMG is significantly much more powerful.2. They"re both more than qualified of putting large holes in anything castle hit.3. Probably .50 BMG due to its higher power and small cross section. That offers it much better sectional density. The .50 BMG is likewise a spitzer round.4. The .50 BMG must be much more accurate due to being a higher velocity spitzer round.5. A cheap .700 Nitro refer rifle is $10,000 and cheap ammunition is $50 per cartridge. That is much more than military and police great .50 BMG rifles and ammunition.6. Uneven you are hunting elephants or have a lot of money to invest on showpieces the .50 BMG is an ext practical.
.50BMG is cheaper, more powerful, and has an ext penetration..700 nitro express is a showoff round, because that hunting.
*

Reminds me of my botchered novel the I"m functioning on a couple of years ago...The powered Exoskeleton operator in the protagonist"s losing usually have actually a .700 NE revolver as back-up weapon.The revolvers fires either a shot-shell or a THV round.

I doubt you deserve to reliably compare the two because they"re in two various niches and also are designed come fufill various roles. Specifically in a army sense since .50 BMG is going to be better designed in terms of army roles (range, penetration, etc.) It"s probably going to it is in BMG for "cost effectiveness" and an ext accurate.The remainder of that is mostly contextual (and duplicating duties anyhow) because terminal results cover "damage in tissues" and "penetration" (penetration is important to determining lethality, not just in bypassing armor but in passing v structures and also body depth - specifically without gift deflected or otherwise degraded in the process of penetration) and KE is going come be concerned that due to the fact that work is going to be done (what you care about more is job-related anyhow, not the full energy which merely represents the potential to perform work. And also work will certainly be shame as much by projectile style and role as the "KE".)
ThatZenoGuyResidential Zealous evolved Nano Organism
Banned
Connor MacLeod said:
I doubt you can reliably compare the two because they"re in two various niches and are designed come fufill various roles. Particularly in a armed forces sense because .50 BMG is going come be much better designed in terms of army roles (range, penetration, etc.) It"s most likely going to be BMG because that "cost effectiveness" and an ext accurate.The remainder of that is greatly contextual (and duplicating functions anyhow) due to the fact that terminal impacts cover "damage in tissues" and also "penetration" (penetration is essential to determining lethality, not only in bypassing armor however in passing through structures and body depth - especially without gift deflected or otherwise degraded in the process of penetration) and KE is going to be regarded that due to the fact that work is going come be done (what you treatment about an ext is work-related anyhow, not the complete energy which just represents the potential to perform work. And also work will certainly be shaped as much by projectile design and duty as the "KE".)
Could the be said that because that literally any terrestrial organism, .700 is more than enough? i mean, just whales have sufficient thickness to resist that monster, right?
*

Ones a short range big game round occurred from black powder ring of similar ilk hence the nitro express tagThe rather a armed forces HMG round additionally extreme long range rifle round completely different niches.

Connor MacLeodYes.
Staff
ThatZenoGuy said:
Could the be argued that for literally any terrestrial organism, .700 is an ext than enough? i mean, just whales have enough thickness to resist that monster, right?
No, because it depends on how the cartridge interacts v the target tissues and there"s always a opportunity of overpenetration (of the target, the the surrounding buildings...) I have no idea if 700 nitro has any kind of sort that ballistic trial and error done, however even if it did the wouldn"t equate well in between differnt creatures as humans have the right to have diffrent tissue compositions/qualities than many pets (like deer) - one factor why pigs were so very prized as "live-fire" check subjects since they carefully correlate come animals.(ballistic gelatin is currently an approximation of person tissue in ~ best, for this reason is going come be also less well suited to pet comparisons, and also vice versa. One factor why girlfriend should always be mindful of ballistig gelatin "showings" online due to the fact that the simulant is expected to be offered in really specific method of comparing weapons effects and the much more you stray from that the less reliable things get.)You literally deserve to have "too powerful" once it comes to firearms because that a specific, intended purpose. And also like all weapons (especially in a military context) the energy is characterized by the intended role(s) the is intended come occupy.
Ian Hogg in "Tank Killing" make mention that between the wars a brothers sporting eight manufatorer made up one or 2 sporting double barrelled guns in .50 BMG (or possibly .50 Vickers)...
RubberanvilHentai Undivided
Most likely the .50 Vickers, the british didn"t take on the .50 BMG till after Lend-lease.

See more: What Does The Name Allison Mean Ing, Origin, Popularity, & Inspiration


Delta Force
As an interesting historical point, the British military actually did usage Nitro express rifles come penetrate steel shields during human being War i (source).