us add an adverse numbers and zero to natural sequence to do it closed under subtraction, the very same thing wake up with division (rational numbers) and also root that -1 (complex numbers).

You are watching: Are natural numbers closed under division

Why this cheat isn"t performed with department by zero?


*

*

You deserve to add department by zero come the rational numbers if you"re careful. Let"s say that a "number" is a pair of integers written in the kind $a\over b$. Normally, us would also say that $b\not=0$, but today we"ll omit that. Let"s call numbers the the kind $a\over 0$ warped. Numbers the aren"t warped are straight.

We usually favor to say that $a\over b = c\over d$ if $ad=bc$, however today we"ll border that and also say it holds only if no $b$ no one $d$ is 0. Otherwise we"ll gain that $1\over 0 = 2\over 0 = -17\over 0$, i beg your pardon isn"t as exciting as it could be. However even through the restriction, us still have actually $1\over 2=2\over 4$, for this reason the right numbers quiet behave together we expect. In particular, us still have the consistent integers: the integer $m$ appears as the right number $m\over 1$.

Addition is defined as usual: $a\over b + c\over d = ad+bc\over bd$. Therefore is multiplication: $a\over b \cdot c\over d = ac\over bd$. Keep in mind that any sum or product that consists of a warped number has actually a warped result, and any sum or product that consists of $0\over 0$ has actually a the an outcome $0\over 0$. The warped numbers are choose a hole that you can fall into but you can"t climb the end of, and $0\over 0$ is a depth hole inside the very first hole.

Now, as chris Eagle indicated, something have to go wrong, but it"s no as bad as it might seem in ~ first. Addition and multiplication are still commutative and associative. Girlfriend can"t actually prove that $0=1$. Let"s go through Chris Eagle"s proof and see what walk wrong. Chris Eagle start by composing $1/0 = x$ and then multiplying both sides by 0. 0 in our device is $0\over 1$, for this reason we get $1\over 00\over 1 = x\cdot 0$, climate $0\over 0 = x\cdot 0$. Appropriate away the proof fails, due to the fact that it wants to have 1 on the left-hand side, but we have actually $0\over 0$ instead, which is different.

So what does walk wrong? no every number has actually a reciprocal. The reciprocal of $x$ is a number $y$ such the $xy = 1$. Warped numbers carry out not have reciprocals. You could want the mutual of $2\over 0$ to it is in $0\over 2$, yet $2\over 0\cdot0\over 2 = 0\over 0$, not $1\over 1$. So any time you desire to take the reciprocal of a number, you have to prove very first that it"s no warped.

See more: What Can Be Found In Every Skeletal Muscle? ? What Can Be Found In Every Skeletal Muscle

Similarly, warped numbers carry out not have actually negatives. There is no number $x$ v $1\over 0+x = 0$. Typically $x-y$ is characterized to it is in $x + (-y)$, and that no longer works, therefore if we desire subtraction we have to discover something else. We have the right to work around that conveniently by defining $a\over b - c\over d = ad-bc\over bd$. Yet then we lose the home that $x - y + y = x$, which just holds for directly numbers. Similarly, us can define division, however if you desire to leveling $xy÷y$ come $x$ you"ll have to prove very first that $y$ is straight.

What else goes wrong? We claimed we want $a\over b = ka\over kb$ when $a\over b$ is straight and $k\not=0$; for example we desire $1\over 2=10\over 20$. Us would likewise like $a\over b+c\over d = ka\over kb + c\over d$ under the exact same conditions. If $c\over d$ is straight, this is fine, yet if $d=0$ then we gain $bc\over 0 = kbc\over 0$. Since $bc$ might be 1, and $k$ can be any type of nonzero integer, we would have actually $p\over 0 = q\over 0$ for every nonzero $p$ and $q$. In various other words, all our warped numbers room equal, other than for $0\over 0$. We have actually a selection about whether to accept this. The alternative is to say the legislation that $a + c = b + c$ whenever $a = b$ applies only as soon as $c$ is straight.

At this allude you need to start to check out why nobody go this. Including a value $c$ to both political parties of an equation is an essential technique. If we throw out approaches as important as that, we won"t be able to solve any problems. On the other hand if we store the techniques and make every the warped numbers equal, then they don"t yes, really tell us anything about the answer other than that us must have actually used a warped number somewhere along the way. You never get any kind of useful outcomes from arithmetic on warped numbers: $a\over 0 + b\over 0 = 0\over 0$ for every $a$ and also $b$. And once you"re right into the warp zone friend can"t get ago out; the answer to any question entailing warped numbers is a warped number itself. Therefore if you want a useful result out, you should avoid utilizing warped number in her calculations.

So let"s to speak that any kind of calculation that consists of a warped number everywhere is "spoiled", because we"re not going to get any type of useful answer the end of it at the end. At ideal we"ll get a warped answer, and we"re most likely to gain $0\over 0$, which tells us nothing. We could like part assurance that a details calculation is not going to it is in spoiled. How can we gain that assurance? by making certain we never use warped numbers. How have the right to we stop warped numbers? Oh... By forbidding department by zero!